why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCMMCMH2ZMUCLFXDQMFUO5ST7XN3ZUQDL4DGYWE2DZHCXBFK47EXKR42 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c61aebe5e89c09523a4e5c01a82bd58d793b3e239ecc009b2bdd30cf85e613bc
- request
- 8d2de14f72f8ae2db7b07bc012b6668fdcb3bef2ff7b292bce7b5c01df5c2fb3
- transaction
- df67dfd7af270aa68fd9e474cba904b1940f15481cd3ef54ed134d438b837863computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10057
the chainentry 10057
- sealed to the entry before
- 9201e2461cdd542b5d1beb48946aadccc78b722cbc38ccdd1486e5d69aed8d4e
- this leaf
- 7f90d448a04234911989de43ca5ccf8d85afd1d3cd99134673d94b20c25dbba1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- /nSjGQCD6sVMKrTrmzbf5UMTm2J7Ii3PsV0/Fhi1u9Ir8hymhU2EXSI5g8jZlGIBCg4VpqtSc6xmAeWoQ2ChBg==