why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBQ62VBGCTQBMB4LRB7NU2LMQXFG4PKPAQK4TFI7OEMH5V24TP7GIEP5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c858a61daf185f5972bb8496464bdb3a63184afb823d8d3f4587a336b5ef6a0d
- request
- d566cace9b5d0394ec3e20af0e3c38ec1d9511f949025c5078f9f8a4880d040d
- transaction
- b4066e3f66cabd9e4c3c0ad23a4d91c4a9a51e2b0658b5cbf41c6c39be3c1d4dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76365
the chainentry 76365
- sealed to the entry before
- 18243a5b4d5da91eb31095b4954b8692367d9a5f971e2a270da77dcae36345ed
- this leaf
- 803e8b752ca5d0b02a24d11ed8dccb4a86b39edec28a4ae94e4382fcdbff96e7
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- S9KqihgqMMtds0GyyF2ppXIKFEDark1IaOoBSRv17/fxqV7Io+D+Mvm0KRn3NmY5NjrvSMQbvqgmMcOvIAeKCw==