livelog 38,063 entries · root ba7368eba7d3 · read 00:52:48
the record/entry 37914
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDZSEZKWMSUSI3ZU3CYIKNISZIO4BZJTMGTZTLOYXM52CWDJERUA4ODX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.781ms2026-09-06 21:57:33
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDZSEZKWMSUSI3ZU3CYIKNISZIO4BZJTMGTZTLOYXM52CWDJERUA4ODX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
51aa3d85e2aeac27ae71c2b9bf142bf438b2b23babad3032c505fe38a81abc90
request
cfe06b99ac5dea1f69ea6013124178998db506c7e289633c5dd09ed2eb839370
transaction
bd42d081f15519cde8f17d0afd3cafb8a53bafbfec30466cf61890d4a7d2a5af
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 37914
recomputing…
the chainentry 37914
sealed to the entry before
a7d87ec90a6523c135c730ccaa53f067667e6858b11503af57039bb0af66c02c
this leaf
81026112c0fc56f53ec4dd797b8a5589955fa4f31c6b8026743fd862a4c4b885
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
cfMBzBo8skqHFOzLgqlrmwHHq1imsXvR5di4NO6SOBNWUXoBhaiIpMTvUXVwhBxzROSAo5yO2TpFMo0l5wgFAg==