why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCAJ4TXT5PAFT7MQDB5SB2WTLGWZA3YAXRSHUM54Z2KYVM52KQ3FTOZZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 0edfa0de4ea81abd13cd8d842c2f80c82ef78af196090a063894131b5471e6d2
- request
- 96885e8d584a1a580a0259841b331bc24c80eeb6b59d5f721c25a26e81946af8
- transaction
- 4d532296aa6551b5b7a92a89c2ff320b252fdebccd8dd7bd2b6598f55a488c7acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 23910
the chainentry 23910
- sealed to the entry before
- 650c0f35ff69d80472ffcdcbaa02dc9197de55706f034e254317f784bae26a90
- this leaf
- 81683c684276b13ce0fe0697fcf1045d616b94e96e6ca2c8b01bf6b9296b0d1c
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 8pO30xi3ZjBdtXxkpmmmVObLEO5zAdW7uLY+Dvwse4l4MSgpPDt+4wWWqmnU51o2PWR+zKkGq3MAk2cPVWSRCQ==