why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBKFYPWL5O4V7CLQFJSAFXXX7JJWSP6BZSTY5B3OETMA26SRNFF5Y5WK, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBKFYPWL5O4V7CLQFJSAFXXX7JJWSP6BZSTY5B3OETMA26SRNFF5Y5WK is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 22a5e832f56a0ddc31b9473a6d095a151ee4c09580140c76214dbef10a0a1eb7
- request
- 5ef188396b0e42fe83d5518a19400afbcafccefc96be75d976a2f644fd2bf2b4
- transaction
- 848ee6c769a750fe393fb5699f5cd80ff7f26811f2cf8ca4a227a53fb9c76716computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 61479
the chainentry 61479
- sealed to the entry before
- 553508dbbaa36f6cfcafcbde3377fc4efa0a173cd89b6dff050c94ee0812479a
- this leaf
- 816bd83f2561244b26afa05a1ba3c21b44ba10e8de49520013aec724c2ddcdc3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- KxU4gvLKPQmF0y11P2Bypxd67MbHpnnU1iLv8QcCkw/6vncOSg+lcKb7svOCKB1c7KdIYka8OLQ7aZj8efJIDg==