why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCAGZIM7DVU7OYUVMCR6PFKKJ7WCTO7DQJW2QYSWRS55OTXXJLRSHR2T to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6fbea44135b9cde89c24838c9c0342bbf585e702ea37fb0fb11395c854066416
- request
- b8cc4746dd060e03430904e82b2057e11a3ff0b3cf7a2f4ae90186c7726add7b
- transaction
- 60d52be39caec82169feb1f94ee6a09081990517efa560bc49acdfb120926108computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 21530
the chainentry 21530
- sealed to the entry before
- bc0713eaa7f1ddc2745222b8c19e805cb9284594070243bff3701909b1a2906b
- this leaf
- 81d043b29520937c3f1d3cb2f4cbcc82e9da252afbda26acc0b787dbba11140a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- PVCBLT5nxq5DlWknlDDLayJzZNYt/C5nym+Rt5rBEJZovFVOY3h1QFjgnUyZPLHF6r0zVEWlzsF2Q646yY41BA==