why1 reason
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 900.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7b0b5425f12e5b65059770545e3c23b0d38db74ac6d4858984b2133b30455358
- request
- 139ab5fa979ccf8544e247381910fd475d626873998ea89bafb37b288743ef85
- transaction
- 6ba857f670f244cfb3f0dbfbec62a870180890b82bac7bc8fbb95c90c4d80ed7computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57258
the chainentry 57258
- sealed to the entry before
- b299ea6b5ef5c958ff1df25593538021d2a019fc1f0f7698b2ef8ae3224cb95c
- this leaf
- 8225a165f2aee07900e17eadd3149f0b8edffb746fe13e3ae70909f65f750751
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- FYJGNtKLUdL7zWTvEny6Cgp48Cu3dAfMN+sWJjTNtOo5dJFZSpFIm6JAI5h4K6BPc3Hfdh+WRwTGLV5j/4rGAQ==