why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBRAJ62H5XAOCW7LJLZVY7BZT55PVRL6C64RHMC65KZ52XSXOEQN4BXB, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBRAJ62H5XAOCW7LJLZVY7BZT55PVRL6C64RHMC65KZ52XSXOEQN4BXB is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 341042476237b7338cb5c23bacf48c130424cb9c3cc78da7e9faac350d16536b
- request
- e7b3bd401f9f0a1c72c814bd6a384d493c0f09e4c5061153cbbc6b0f95b76152
- transaction
- a4680e0728c046b64c745f78a9c95e92865bdaee1d25a04c97ab9712689bea10computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 33970
the chainentry 33970
- sealed to the entry before
- 06f290eddc80b10549770029da47574a98daf0dd3ce7551beeb21f57eb989b5e
- this leaf
- 837ea83c30d9c93cb18e819bcf2e546dd406580e225ff04e1b9298355b86b7cd
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Rvp02qrvEzEjPkmZn/ja1DVGOf92uBeNie0qITiJlGIIChkLxQC72qPqiGo4iSNLSaHJtf5zP83YxZc9hiDdCQ==