why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB7CO7GXHREI47HMUZ4ECKNWT7GJA25SECYJ5PWVE6GJMQTXQWPYEXN4, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB7CO7GXHREI47HMUZ4ECKNWT7GJA25SECYJ5PWVE6GJMQTXQWPYEXN4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 14512d1ce4b86fa1b709ba6be27326ff2a3cfabcb42ea06ee2c340272e2a9a85
- request
- d69c64e935c8e16f1695bfcc5e557b33dcb824f2cbbfe5b8f0f51b32cef912e3
- transaction
- 9d8e506c86203ebf8c865a881c0c5ca1abf8b085a94caa23732a5f019029ade2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 74011
the chainentry 74011
- sealed to the entry before
- f1100c73cc12b3fe55fc5ce14f51020992c6741c959d792fd1f1a058799a1eb8
- this leaf
- 83b1b727e2c3152cde27421bb5b3c971c1b54fe8388cd89244212e69e46228f9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- iE9xrR8Cty662lCiBwmck5VMnE7xPPliYvlnI1UJjv+yxPLiEECIOHywoIwYRkf1lmvVuBNaSZKh/ue/17tVBQ==