why3 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDVOTCOARJ3MVOI2GVDOJLZ46VNZNOJFOKVTOIOTX3GH5JMDRHABO2ZA to 100 over the last 60000ms, above the 60 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 100.0000000, above 80% of the 100 cap, human approval required
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBAO6X27JR45V7OMLYAYP5SAD4JSCZGIUC2NWYVGNX7X4KYRCPLC6VYW is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b19b1284dcdf179be77548f7560df19d6938ef167611d4be6957ff23c81db3b4
- request
- 561c02400d2ffb77fa387d5e605e158f4026997a09fb542d4e2c11434b86e8d2
- transaction
- ddc49bea51ea41eddc8dcf1fe1646111ab59ed6d22dfd1b7034e461f5a38d444computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1173
the chainentry 1173
- sealed to the entry before
- dd885d09daf434bacd70c232bedb56e9fa8075e02c03fb45b972478b03bcfddb
- this leaf
- 83e6ee6c47a3da002a6bcb1dd750401c7ca656ba0415ef4fd42a32312c4f2c50
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- N+fS5eS4dQJWwMliQx7A6QScG0xFOTT0AClpY+VhTCC2BKKBPXJgmnyFU9uhqLLN+j+x+vjk1zZkw079T2mrBg==