why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB3LHC5BRKQH73WI7KTHXMYFSAHL6R3RKZPNKXQ4Y73KM3BYIPDENAIO, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d35ed18dd022b7c45efd33493c2da9aea5fe292c7998db43b79ef75eaad92456
- request
- 052c8255bdfa724c939d975932d9887198f139055954fa878f4d187e735f3c8c
- transaction
- 980e88469e9628daad6ed6d0d582133982b7bbf924ba429dbb901093cbfb3868computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57311
the chainentry 57311
- sealed to the entry before
- e30b9906452508a0de8ca9eaff474bfdfb382568c4619b41c978f2917da11262
- this leaf
- 8477ca2795b6b383aa35f9f2b9eb5d7b5dbf0135ae42185d78ee9f28c71b4667
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- vf3IGI+Ok0eCvswzFa33hq3OpH1HURycSHRc6Nkz4J1XuuHLtGf7LmoyIaEjC6jfCHb99ECigWPrgn24Q6Q7AQ==