livelog 17,594 entries · root 28cf5a32a735 · read 04:17:38
the record/entry 17064
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDKYQPDJW3BVVLKPR6NNPARMR7AE5KHVURYQDXTFPLKLGQB2UUYDUT4V to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.912ms2026-08-21 18:27:31
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDKYQPDJW3BVVLKPR6NNPARMR7AE5KHVURYQDXTFPLKLGQB2UUYDUT4V to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
35b71f5046f3425de9b75452cb098a30d68e7c3149a20172bd7c57728e3c2c5d
request
5c2007682002cb723bd8a130ccace832edc1be24aec1fb474ee9b6d3fa02db6b
transaction
aed104ac244c558af0871ef7dcac1b683df3a70bdf5f6a8342e6336cc349c081
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 17064
recomputing…
the chainentry 17064
sealed to the entry before
c3ce403d78c15182eea1006cfe18be61875afacdaa321eefd6462f6ddb61fbcb
this leaf
8499225421f67fd98e3ff01b3b2caf0eaf54ba76f06a8f264ccf41fb34dd0512
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
OJklDk9FS9xEjKyupS00+c7rKoRZRr5fVdgxiAGc05PIYMu3Z3BoRYI7qr6cgQ6d5Up3YMkDk7pMEGsT3EI+AQ==