why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBVC4FORXGJF3VU6P6QRLQUT3TTF2335ZWUVIVVST3X2KTCGOZ7C23J6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a337efc957a7732278c53d54bce064dd6130ff0a4061663bf35f06dcfe577b77
- request
- fe75cb4715b08b60eca4401e6a6ff7332d6b98fe9fbe5bbb4153260ec66cbf01
- transaction
- 6bc4097c9b0728380b0e2f92081e595bed934a1e4a4eb470c4e35ff0c4ab7ed0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 27828
the chainentry 27828
- sealed to the entry before
- 5e82744936c2848b0abc27b2deb848d4cff4d96fbf2888eeb873710626630f64
- this leaf
- 84a725d6739d42d79522eb53aefd1121a8bd33ae0f15b62f13a2e9950548ce06
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- QckSeC/MDudc9loplzSmRE7B0oaWGyhP65SVVPD5KygBsW3pe7I9a6nfTTVd8mNRP47YELOCVbTL64flTtvUDg==