livelog 57,463 entries · root 897ff725f610 · read 15:11:20
the record/entry 57293
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDP5QBFUBW2P2Z45GFNLJHCXN6S2OC3TQAM4OQOGQLJBR52Y33CBRURD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.835ms2026-09-21 12:11:15
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDP5QBFUBW2P2Z45GFNLJHCXN6S2OC3TQAM4OQOGQLJBR52Y33CBRURD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
4b6633950b41d81acf3b15358958187f3b83fc43f491e31c419010823aa27594
request
5f06bbeb2fd9c9b88f08cb9214d65bb84115179dbdd5fc38859565b255946af0
transaction
17af32332843fac5dcfdf96a8569c887c2bc19569bbf7fe70ad2b20938c92279
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57293
recomputing…
the chainentry 57293
sealed to the entry before
3b65dbee5ca13169678c8c79125f0ca18ac5550c3639b09af56a591392be9dc7
this leaf
850e0a0f0ceb5845f79576fc5df12f697ec4f22a63e8c606e21d28fe14743f49
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
xDFw2Sp78Past8iCozf1NyxLDhdKO+rrph9ovl1QXvOi3EA+Urvvx3sCqpg7n4Sd+6OQt2P1Aklxn279sOIcAA==