livelog 16,080 entries · root cc9945b2e8de · read 00:02:40
the record/entry 15079
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GC5QSGD7Y3GMRD7RH7FKXIUQKASCD7V7MHJWS7OZR4IES3JSHDABN77L to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.020ms2026-08-20 05:42:27
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GC5QSGD7Y3GMRD7RH7FKXIUQKASCD7V7MHJWS7OZR4IES3JSHDABN77L to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
6045c284d50ce9373ad5444d5784f64796549c31b4f574ed8ae563205d2b39c8
request
27b4f19e8597471ece03dff271fa7253f93d7ff50917a39191e80d5ac18d2eb2
transaction
6560f0a67af501e4aefb36428c6a9dce069b4811537dae62c3336fe75ccde224
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15079
recomputing…
the chainentry 15079
sealed to the entry before
2fbdcfebb9ac50879555dbdb3f4d8504a7314dc94f631851370f1db6c398c181
this leaf
855da0f52603d82ecbc91cba97045329e3c83798f0d6ab090cd3c60b31954b58
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
japEXPfxhD4ypVhzFQZqygbtFEC712LjVDzbTpkS2/mRos0gRahjameYOi7YRlUHcLqry8wJrBQPfKEP5Vs8CQ==