why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCXQWUDAMXQF6OSRNXSLCPDNMEDVZC62SQK4RY34DXO54LFK76F3VA3Y, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCXQWUDAMXQF6OSRNXSLCPDNMEDVZC62SQK4RY34DXO54LFK76F3VA3Y is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- af9defaeaa01bdaa438db82ec6a02dd3c75a56710ac90bf563b83dd466fb0a97
- request
- 9a3ecb2f5299934ecd1de277911c35723aed2ba5c72ed3ec494251fd26877fff
- transaction
- 7e45e22931ac7d6487064accffc549232049c512afe1a6e9e217d473ef5d955bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 68195
the chainentry 68195
- sealed to the entry before
- 8c8029d72c6e4133fbf4f40cb9551bed2811057f6607860afa974fa7fae270aa
- this leaf
- 859725da19f37254fb5e392b72998a67583f6003042a6a243ee719520767c240
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +G30udfTnvXS9JpnZkB1Zb0AA5rcCw/1bn1rGNh8f/OAnj6vMq35NtluKq0uiXiTOO1D5gIXxQeZ5E6iVoWWBA==