livelog 10,531 entries · root 7619fc2029cb · read 16:37:59
the record/entry 10359
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCSLHVPW3THPF3BJUBXWNRAOGPUIE7M2IBXYJVBDRU4HGDBLMR3NO5MP to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 6.849ms2026-08-16 13:27:40
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCSLHVPW3THPF3BJUBXWNRAOGPUIE7M2IBXYJVBDRU4HGDBLMR3NO5MP to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
b457b6a44779770d6ad81f583d73042ab8a9de35dbf3137790eaf6b87fff9ecb
request
1a0bbdfcbde58a90c9ae1d72ca442a433094f66620a547fc9bce5245b4702d60
transaction
c796ca2e822421a361bd61987e60c5676bcf4d01ac5fb06e28172472c031eaa1
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10359
recomputing…
the chainentry 10359
sealed to the entry before
e34136a994eef9abcdbba3c7ec04a3910a795021cd0ef07951c7cb89ede4f1f9
this leaf
85be445d8b31fc9b263e5d943ed06c00ea2d4499b035f353503c3e2f1d3eb886
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
tDn+tYBx29Zq/Oh9VZhYb3CdMmhA6PtTsoVG/blEchTC0BgwwR2kNjsc0Q1+QFXFNa0bgrbq5BSeTzfEDdHsBw==