why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCT6HRBPDXWN3K6K4ALPBPPDMUSPP65M3WQZ27C4XWXOKSBS7K2BOKOJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c8143e9d99a5cbba2e0e5364df28d7723ce9596b54b7c70a92c950d1a3dbc6f2
- request
- f46c165aa10d0d76d1d991258f699f9472e53de0afc38e5addca2a31fb034797
- transaction
- 8a8017f0309979bf27e336ab5a47a0fab7a8d0b45c5b1d66ca55578c35c709b0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 32130
the chainentry 32130
- sealed to the entry before
- d3cb2958e8bbc8e059e899d603218d78cc0bb32c3d8bbc0d6feac8d25ef77f9a
- this leaf
- 866d612c72e61de96430ae387ce49c336414b94a5de3b848384c010525ace5ea
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- tBaqCPCY6B94GoWIjh91xIOnk0fh71KzGxxOU2CdlUvINc+3itYTDE+sa58PlJ34i6RdDC9Jy7uiW1SBP0U8Cw==