why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCQK2XBGM7JFRGJFGOK5VIT4YCKD7TL5U5NKZAMB3FKNFAFB4ZFHNNXG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 36891f08249e125d7cb56a13300c308ea9251b6b780e79607cba015345819c30
- request
- 0cc5d383164f24eae711ab9ad20f4e48a2507e04d03f26bfc7fcd4dd84f1db71
- transaction
- ed0e7a26d312a4594bd9597d7bcff2b7a8ab8c957e6ea7fe65e10f31c1774fdacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 36496
the chainentry 36496
- sealed to the entry before
- 52a49219e17064bda39c17a57038aaf7c698dc5cbd4fc6b350c8fafd1bfca484
- this leaf
- 870b1428dcbbd8cefcffac53c2f50411a06772464eb00c870ff6d8912b2ec08a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +Y2/bzVmu/ETdBzt1bgEICurxc9OlgjpKJxYvsCDiImroLlayR22eEB2iwRAHptXZl1HmQPCDUEddf3hhUkZCQ==