why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCIB6CYPZYXZLDPPO656NLLF2VT4R64BS3MSK3ZOKIW7VX2U3FLWV5WS to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d88eaafe516f397ccfd86ab43532f1f2860fc37dc9923960b6da1bc3fbedf20b
- request
- 1e42b6d7f6e9fdc5b3003635fe420d37cd0ffd2c0a942fbee5ef0cb8a0868240
- transaction
- 1f0827f2d0ce1c3c3a50b77f03b7a565d2bf26787ec47f7c33e3679f5898db3acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 73801
the chainentry 73801
- sealed to the entry before
- 89fe0aade5e7f11a71dd33ed2f10949db59532dce15a3b3ce956a942e3752382
- this leaf
- 877ac13800f799c228e723b90e2e48e5ab56fc08dca46eb7ff08e554f4c8c8cd
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- JjikMXUPCWEbXnSmRkaJOrSJ46EUQefBO/cfbRZioXje3Hv1XF/5buVANItSQ49ohTyLoPyTU8Fik7E0+GV8Bg==