why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB4XNPB4CT3XDPQIYFXGPDM4QFL6JOJIR5KABCY5FOTWQT4GYPHSYJ3T, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB4XNPB4CT3XDPQIYFXGPDM4QFL6JOJIR5KABCY5FOTWQT4GYPHSYJ3T is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d6a4379f44f1bc845d0ee2d493c3edddfd35b6e62d0a087c06559dee4fd61002
- request
- 809084635872bfdfeab81998766542e402c853f2d802f19d319e6a3cf935678c
- transaction
- 674a381a4913df32e7e189765250f7534c96b6629adc7087141d81275ffc3f62computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 14405
the chainentry 14405
- sealed to the entry before
- 515c7e87dfd05ed161e4bba7b9067494e3712c811f4fca96e99db2047a2d30c3
- this leaf
- 87ea86e051c4a34281d3407e960486749a18086eead17f11d7d22c3911725680
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- qsETWb+JKpFAeHrRym/E58d49HSbZHIyMktBZBVBexzZKg8FtzoQSYQYzTBj6F7QCMaN46Tn5A7IjP4tCIo7AA==