why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBMXH3SJJHROPS5W34XQ5X72C3ME533NSKU4QMAQ5QBPXSJ4RJ6XLJ2J to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d1cc0370ef0e34f410321027d07dc79511cd88b81bf5d3f598d81f313cc3d6c2
- request
- cbb7742d8649ed6dfb417ad64b10315a04f7fbf1846b26ffd3375f633084e069
- transaction
- a39f7e0e9e11a53355f2bb19004f36d385bd11fbb59faed254717f8b174d0459computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 19115
the chainentry 19115
- sealed to the entry before
- c005b3b7bd6f83b856ffad675daa154d271fbdabbff005e845fd19974d60ddf7
- this leaf
- 88d3e24ee686b02f9871c7ce1031698055dd01b4d54d72e56bbb8bb83319b076
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- b6N253Hxyf5yuy6EL7GRe+ZL/60abcXniTtSriymwHiL/f+Ae8UddGprLIn8i4jDexzemV8NN/KcAMdQLBWmDw==