why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBBKCXNUL6QBQEAVEMZW4AQ4H4WKFVEMZR3AD6JHDT2ZT56AQUMIHFHB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 3977c186fbb9afdda6484fa0f8353d557547ae3f02e649f793dd2452b4aa7d01
- request
- b7dd08c3a195d17501098b66e29faf571cb276b06d424e81e6b1bab1f1d6c709
- transaction
- d6b24eddbd6b3ab4292899c2d2a6a6b96c9e7975f5c76ddd9aaa991e2f2b5e85computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 5673
the chainentry 5673
- sealed to the entry before
- 4d9025a620fc5eacc65001c1fe8ffb3eca6e3506e9cd0203bced706c9abff839
- this leaf
- 89a98f898ae3e363c31b736f438831363ea6ab4259b9451bdd91bfcdcbcbc234
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- G9SHQfMeLzvMBfh9bhlW0LfF2r2aiJ/2T2Sr88TIg9+csPHCMyCny1X4CPmvgM88eDvEXXwzfLGt6zn4/NhxCw==