why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQ5QSXP4FR5QAVTYRZKF6BXOL2OHOW67G3C5TQDJLY4SOPLIIIBZJM6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c375be3de6f6b591cc7ed7eeac426c9ffe7e9e71ac5bce346a6d31462a424552
- request
- a10646c825c0edca9d6150bcf77ae77d164e22174a2124f93e9c16685912c3c3
- transaction
- 1f4870903ca353f02b4fb68814296c2fcd3054dcb5f3e58a21422404c894eaaccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 52038
the chainentry 52038
- sealed to the entry before
- dfcee9bed1b369dae72a9ecc869fec39d782873f5c5d2af7abcc33b130539d48
- this leaf
- 8a9e4b0791289cf8f4046e3bc2df529f362adb991fb1605c0504cd643e01705d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- L8sTSPxYJGIBzTIZ3Au6GZ3dvqXzS4bNoJ8yuqSR1lmIAZ4epJa4zwykHr1rJzmC3aw4sEycdxNxl6C3cnZLBw==