why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBHBXBDLFMLWVWUEV6CHYQS72BYJB4NFM5ICM4O6B4NT6YCWB7EOM65M, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBHBXBDLFMLWVWUEV6CHYQS72BYJB4NFM5ICM4O6B4NT6YCWB7EOM65M is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a9579711d21f3fb82668340fc6196943366b6795940bb135d2d7ceca891eade3
- request
- 993d8eea1004065331510dc4dee3410fe8de9e55d3bed9aae7cb9572c5ae29c7
- transaction
- 05ae6c21c9c2025adec3c3b4df820f7e4c919314f8a1dcc46157dfe385c2d4e9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 67290
the chainentry 67290
- sealed to the entry before
- 92d5bc99277f6e853f347ceea4f6ceddb93889a548d05c7126cd661a7e163d05
- this leaf
- 8ae1c8b71894f036062bddef1a49511a14fc3dddaa0036dfd609099e08b57eda
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- yl0UfqzHfCZcefFNBHYkSn9uWtro/7fg3fLco83Kf1/XeqQsRWpwBHZbdrxyBKKV6oloHsqJ3j0nibhx4AWlCA==