why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB6HXZKWVDTNBVALZW75OSW3EMI4LOESUKGCYB44UKYJL4QDQHUIINP2, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB6HXZKWVDTNBVALZW75OSW3EMI4LOESUKGCYB44UKYJL4QDQHUIINP2 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a52a99fa6b41f2e9cb7735e2ab86da53269400683323abc82c1e741193f81aeb
- request
- c1bef5cbec55f6ed168b020437067f18cbdd28d6dc9f1e3625e3dbeb5098d32a
- transaction
- 6f0266567087e8c273c08e094fd3129c00333013666818386edf772e78414e01computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 65494
the chainentry 65494
- sealed to the entry before
- 727d8f7afa3ce330d2367f6d9c9c935c6cd35dea316d3a5fbba7dbc47291caec
- this leaf
- 8b46ab39445f2b89ce5055fa844d79da258b1618ee266de8ef202d936aeb4943
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0nXXGsTfsjN9K+IFZoXPcrhHl4UT3DL7HP6OewJOujQsNiMckGzIy2ME0T4700tt1stfbP8SSJW0HRGinBA3Dw==