livelog 42,985 entries · root 56d8d3c3676b · read 19:50:39
the record/entry 41707
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAAUZDZ74T7BEHIOHQ53JSKFFU36YWUVDT6F2546GEOI25KNKAXZTXPT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.466ms2026-09-09 20:10:12
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAAUZDZ74T7BEHIOHQ53JSKFFU36YWUVDT6F2546GEOI25KNKAXZTXPT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
20abbad8841d53e615631b6e6ac89fe2295fe1f8668495bbbe86b84a4722ab55
request
b182212434b8744383cece0006de745431826a4837f5e76aa4676b9b19f6b199
transaction
8548a7fd3be1887b11bc33f3d82dd2c1989815b28d4bcb432bdf23600c3124fb
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 41707
recomputing…
the chainentry 41707
sealed to the entry before
f9b122be43c4880f3914cd56882453adc3277b4f8314b9c7ccd60cadff340347
this leaf
8c3b2d9a28d306abb87fa0d47993eab0c0b24f02996658f193269ce39ffeaf35
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
espuz1pcSOOH75DuVJbX825B7bREwB3wJoAdLbfn/MQWeMIxQYu2P5zBME2crlzjxXK4ms5uqHj0zGssbvkZDA==