why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBIPGNAWS3EN32M4FKZLPENCZAYLFJCP4JYSTSGDKWAJKAH3TOQPY47C, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBIPGNAWS3EN32M4FKZLPENCZAYLFJCP4JYSTSGDKWAJKAH3TOQPY47C is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bce509338d44fa2d955e76b8c54df8305cc04f6af4e22e06cbc929d3c45ce182
- request
- a9c7dff80f658a2eae1adfe16bb5b62211e07b2d9f838b673e50c53b69079e68
- transaction
- 0a3954c4685e3e7cb7d643c2ea3b62e8879a0562f5d7294057a98cc41b6d50f2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 72127
the chainentry 72127
- sealed to the entry before
- 4400208bde3c8ae4204623974a974ec76da10c208509f0725981903b091d05d0
- this leaf
- 8cc4a506524dc15a8698d1edeb49e36e64915be2675043e2042d7b549818a6e2
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Yq8DF9rEIryAdeXYBdzX0G5xZp++q96Ws6ldEoN/UsGpcQBlgDVfGVmSO2MyxXJCslf3LMTyueZIee2VtVdzAw==