why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCQY5SDVZTSU75XFZ6GO4UMK5Q42KTB5BO43SLMQNRHBJC4JWIRC7OD2, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCQY5SDVZTSU75XFZ6GO4UMK5Q42KTB5BO43SLMQNRHBJC4JWIRC7OD2 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 878a14dca5b6fb70829aa448d2530333efe2fc00083ed36becffa735914c00a7
- request
- 8fb0d035353290bc63345a25b7b844fc10561f098f9038d48b74fe094881e86f
- transaction
- 531b402330dea4f63e930c89258aea5f11c0ee8022d201232bf509b9e3c6d7bccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 43467
the chainentry 43467
- sealed to the entry before
- f257e26506819d5189bb9efde838a8607307a863630543290960d8991eb768c0
- this leaf
- 8d404225fa0d488bd8ebe6f7234432c396192fcbba19160ce4c0ff60a0abb83e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 3ck9C79R1R1jy1tmuadqB90aYvSqxlqzKXSmZfTI3QZ4XZaRp6tbkWo1aOzJzkIh39XJ11nxi7BsEORU1dsvCQ==