why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDY2LCNBDTU6SWPUSRGFFQRH6CXLJF7QMQYZD5EKJT26B4EB34V6PVGE, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 999.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 688f0979fb9cb517cb9622578b64c27015ba30d3aeaa6b17c6c61d3d72b4954c
- request
- 7b1238bd374151af2b8c592d50069984cd4b3a601b0b63457f4f9b12a80aed5c
- transaction
- 413a24cfb15a61e157688da421995bc69a4a1702a362497117658b693cfb798bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50776
the chainentry 50776
- sealed to the entry before
- 6a30f43418503795db1d8d5060e85177ba4477af72ddc4e6897a12c70483c6e8
- this leaf
- 8d923c5832aed97e99f00528e62731e47a695bc90ddabee1b24a1afd13d2a210
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- pB2FV7t7jlrCBS3sDwIrIHOUUfJ6R3PHgC8fqLxjaUre5OklOd0POchZRevGW3cr5nUlx1na1RZyYH5NpLIUBg==