why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDYUJ4MM2UQKMO35DQSDJJFYWILBFFL3M3KLM7XZAZ57IYY4EKWF47EP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1870299a4b89f200d405a4450a8a50997bfd81e1603bac1d9f2507ba628b89a1
- request
- b8778c161c4dc2807b10123e6d50f28447cda6d116b1d79f4c169eed19813043
- transaction
- b69b501a2d5921b4b252fd7ac02ebeda04ea3b2ca6a60c5e42f41c6b34c298e0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 27619
the chainentry 27619
- sealed to the entry before
- 523d8738a2f34dbd0ccd123643cb29ce43461462dfb09a70bd418adb1ce24822
- this leaf
- 8e2f8f8e267c23e1a5eaf8a0ca17a7ec076ac61cef030968ebaae8f7ba614bb4
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 9W6wARvSSsIOq1XVNt9hYn21dMEIFpH50esRTJ+5AaG465z0lBXB20UBVWBYmJo8O4bOTX5g4+dOSfDxLEL5CA==