livelog 11,194 entries · root 86519be67271 · read 04:49:46
the record/entry 7129
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBS4XJK64WKCQNJL4EDHWNC2K7OTXVSZQYJXEGQHMFG644JLAHYSD7WM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.310ms2026-08-14 00:42:24
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBS4XJK64WKCQNJL4EDHWNC2K7OTXVSZQYJXEGQHMFG644JLAHYSD7WM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9f0558e4d80fb3c9b959a5dc33d9ef7d3b4b54e0dd46998e3f88a73dd4f52366
request
7b535dad338a99020aa48280c0a7398ba90bce377b3c92b6ee05df8d8d0d21fb
transaction
7aa2b8ac0c9acf0b62f90e6caf27a33f916c5ee21d411d82ec9285b2e836f7f8
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7129
recomputing…
the chainentry 7129
sealed to the entry before
f1d82191f21780b0ecf13a6384c0c948f594e702de731710571416a5d1a318db
this leaf
90663d1f49c1ca13be00c4e04180791422fc8e370157be305dbea267bde8d768
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
P9PZ9T9P8P/JrNFAo9RB8OBksLvMygf8vTqI7fRsNktufpT0gpWH1DqZU9J7SRHIXYZQ0nJu2M+M8HHuKmNGBQ==