why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC4C3GW6S6JL6K343ORDXKY5E2IUR3ZQXB6V4J5PWQY7UQIRQO4OX4ZG, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC4C3GW6S6JL6K343ORDXKY5E2IUR3ZQXB6V4J5PWQY7UQIRQO4OX4ZG is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9458a1ffe1628677ff5f00145a720d5c65b72f9b741c5f3cd994440873145364
- request
- e0ceab780867beb52427d4522ceca697cd375cdffddaf1693affc9be54ee730a
- transaction
- 1f36e3fee0f960dec2f5b633907eabb34c199dfc053107c3e4ec49bbad3dcce0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 21034
the chainentry 21034
- sealed to the entry before
- 546932d22c7164c0b7446c47a44a19b27459849b558346fbdfdbefbb15e9f79d
- this leaf
- 91f1f5239052665639ab91dbbc0f765eb20d1cc88702ca925652287e69202180
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- o/zTCeE/9HF8mANFw0L5AewIzJTHUCmGn8rQgQmX08uUwj8itELzWqL4mKQCR6zw+Fd8yqV3UuqBDUeT/+6tDg==