why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GC4KQHGVOCTKNDUL3BIFDN5GRZARKKMNRHUKFKLHIHDC7XJ3K4Q3IFWD, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCYPKKUFNDM5WZKGZBPHXXFQERXAFYPXNGAEG47BP7EJABZVG54SC6LK, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCYPKKUFNDM5WZKGZBPHXXFQERXAFYPXNGAEG47BP7EJABZVG54SC6LK is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- cfd7530d03e80351ea61af5c5bcf8727cdf04ddcb869499179358a624b8d2792
- request
- 2aa099b505631d8ac13c9ceeab6b6acb18db38d9e5ff8959698058190c34beb2
- transaction
- 73886aae785cdc3c04c5ab756f326e28a1391e6dc3ac7655db17da75657c05a3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 65381
the chainentry 65381
- sealed to the entry before
- e37bbc64c096310174a80f25dbf744984f54432bd128bc8396e745b26fe20abe
- this leaf
- 92359112d5b3daa5224301aa0466c894de1f0c3ae4b8fcb14f33c793e99875ba
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- lBEBbmvGtCiATPFA+3907gIWCgjMRcEzCuUIq2syUaptQ39DZE78lg/po3euVmQ1DsxQdUl5M+/2idxbfzreBw==