livelog 31,904 entries · root 2aa0cff552e5 · read 05:42:45
the record/entry 31437
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCUVNQIB7EPM5DTTIIAOVSFQMWKR335L3IVZYAPYNS6NF2H6UHOH5UAW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.536ms2026-09-01 21:17:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCUVNQIB7EPM5DTTIIAOVSFQMWKR335L3IVZYAPYNS6NF2H6UHOH5UAW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
c826a3724ccd580025204484bbd83dfbcd1076a3bf733ee972dad29a6bfc7fba
request
830a55623c820cdc7a6a60c08e47d9c71ecb2229566f9fd25a11944cfd434516
transaction
dbb70dcab0dbba1c0891846dbe504bff2a8e25702bd6945d166bc2b67e8154c2
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 31437
recomputing…
the chainentry 31437
sealed to the entry before
70436633308f2276294ef02020ef928339c55f8651daab5206567c45352f967a
this leaf
92890327dc18b146ab481e1c24a81786a247e1d1c1451d941dcb40a2630c0142
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
07fOYIbfu3CKB8JM2oKMgvAY2HDK9iX8dlfuRvpnEd7uFXJgeOGeGvQ53vxE1JUwBW6vkG0iSEw7OUmjDHWwBA==