why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAQOFHRTIPWUV5Z7WSJJWQLU73XA6FY3TW5GLXAGI4NH5FUX4UV2XR27 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c945f58edf5210d333f80acfb2e5538c45adbba218f862bc6d12d340287e0eda
- request
- 27cf7303cc0ede6804a562e766d60f0f4c8079d9e011edb6818f603483b14fd3
- transaction
- 91b3f7a4db5e49c4c9d6c0b73fcb6a508c5b030d6c80c299394f06220bfd8087computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57037
the chainentry 57037
- sealed to the entry before
- 333765d6eec7fedc2fca469fe715e1ac70bde3804ccbc205440cabb50045c5c3
- this leaf
- 92d4d70bc1158079fb6a3261f3ef7985993588b04f9f01c209fad599e3336207
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- rMT6Au11iM8HlJJRwv/f5f4DPlYQOpHXRrEWFnEG4MwX7wCT7zb8OfkIxDOO3wU8f8sqRduujPK1pnBi6zMdAA==