why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAORXS774WEJOZXPCY6FDTSAHGX7BPBULI3CB4QCBHOQ4HI6MCFTP4T6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1db6ff5232db1054d6cb1bc4b5cf0e0c1cf6bb3fd1c167a7ab57d5d1eaedeb1d
- request
- 76192ddc680103c1d1c98c6917f49201a769dcb103f9a6401c6bffa73d347a9b
- transaction
- 4e17444f0a90da6716a40072fe13c9c55485410333e37e7470755cf8115c70c1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 4299
the chainentry 4299
- sealed to the entry before
- c15c3496690308ba327bfb83b0686963d69301bbcefd23ac3f8cd5a55b1fb6a9
- this leaf
- 93d6381d7ce922c32e7a42229c9196d2a48aa9f66788671911498d15e5d44824
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- a1EPYvm8rEPolmqLvxRlPzr8/UFvLKN4W2jP3+Q9vWaluMS+V+V9Yfg6Sz96r2UP2rQTcSVj2gp/Sq5OsxL1BQ==