why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBC4LPTN3LRPGV5GBETPFTV7HZCVQCCE4I3BKRO67TC7BTL3LVEFL5XQ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBC4LPTN3LRPGV5GBETPFTV7HZCVQCCE4I3BKRO67TC7BTL3LVEFL5XQ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8821709699d5abe4cbe6939ab88b917ac1acfce9a1edba9f07794ccf27bce2e1
- request
- 906074bbcf4166a32d1736820447074f838ef5908e8f90c204ca0f922287b78d
- transaction
- c0d843a58159f49af55500ef0d98eb4cdf157ccc2000daac681905338982fa42computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 16567
the chainentry 16567
- sealed to the entry before
- 3d532fbf8e6d6f7c0255ea9650c6313497841008e9f5c67e4845beaece07df3d
- this leaf
- 94460e3f6f03db870816e0e2c0e5b3cd3ce0eb32870ff5c58dcef3d06fe38687
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 5t8Wl2r2Eqc7WsUQ0k0qcFh0l5vSOZUfpXfXMRjDKzuC7Z14zHEjUWEHVb2gMjTNTFuVFKjx5FfAtlR/zkflAw==