why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GA5NXZ3EL3VLVCVTVBZ6BWX43O2JAFKREFTS3N72OED4EL4B3WR4SBFL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 2810a20a1b6ad76d8bbc984e4fb0b3c4ceb6789425348e0e99de9705c037d4d1
- request
- d84f5682549d9d793ee8c65c6f485397d994f35ff20d7914bc0d5ab205367260
- transaction
- baf45b0121db41afa1915672bd401b172f0cdaf9c1b4641f9c24013b519ad3e9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15372
the chainentry 15372
- sealed to the entry before
- df3dbbf48ab04de59f92e1d8668a5bba4840d787cece032a6dcc0556f9599d02
- this leaf
- 9464c497a1d5b53acfd1deeb4bbaf7792e40686785e5773bb8ae280224c16795
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- W+a/WgetTv2VXSVtZKQ7+nIN/LnmwrM8XBNlCWggIhEZ2PMmW+k5qEF3gCK6k6fLOgOJ9laYcblwJQ1+Jkr1Cw==