why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBQU5KHDGAYZ7WPTBN3AFLCO4HQOZA4WT6B7SLOYW2NQK4E3QRGUP4IB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- df6803dfb9288e68a085ffd08ce7b8248fb73763b1b3fc9257efa03fb008b0aa
- request
- 58d32db748103d28dae760ea0a79a2670733b155d322a1968e666b5a6559e613
- transaction
- 56fdc80552de0a692e7a4852352722af4b26a00dc2afc9454e25b16a0ce36c97computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28697
the chainentry 28697
- sealed to the entry before
- 4805474bd0d8add0821cae0c2971f2475a57d7aeaae75d844d5894579e897e6c
- this leaf
- 94c4a0dcc801192fc51db0a5bc07b1420b1895417a13cb0fa662ae46a89176b0
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- dCBOZs1xLMUG5uz2pqt/Q/y9A5B6aH0cFEt4j4miuh3N0qAjF5SyhnbrES+GwUmpPAvU2bOuLNEhySdBnyxABQ==