why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCWOGHHV6I4HHSDYQURNZ5LJ2BUYIB6U4J6XV3POGK7HZSMMQN422UQJ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCWOGHHV6I4HHSDYQURNZ5LJ2BUYIB6U4J6XV3POGK7HZSMMQN422UQJ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 471a9704424df49d8e703d1d879622ff96831e01e78a9b87e9fe2eaa07995bd5
- request
- 273388207f0487ddd2f62cc9c49a821b56882c3c7a00f326aded97fb3222fcf6
- transaction
- aded5bce991708da4c49afc94ecdf50162c7c2ea7cbb6e73bdc2907a17594af1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 58345
the chainentry 58345
- sealed to the entry before
- ed631ddabe4cae1923f93043635a02aeee8cf3e601748de8b8e2f51755cd678b
- this leaf
- 9524c51330e9231fb70d266833d4222d91f7d8d8f906bf422f6f08fc39ed31b9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- sqKyoFVnoj7IBKVKWM6KspLuQnf6ocNzBfCf0FD40DyT7EKpPE5TCMjHEXQnZgez9kzn/J3DQxm1eIAPUFl/BQ==