livelog 42,649 entries · root 5cd9b6710da9 · read 13:20:43
the record/entry 41075
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBYDOSEMWFDQ7P7T6PVYIEDLIKAVUS7QD7CRWLCBFRNEZDFFPY7JXBWJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.964ms2026-09-09 08:15:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBYDOSEMWFDQ7P7T6PVYIEDLIKAVUS7QD7CRWLCBFRNEZDFFPY7JXBWJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
fa5621207c4708bec9b7b1af1cf721bf34b1fa337270692fee98bf4c12e506fd
request
7b47f38b09847367eb7f186db96d63fa072ef78d1e6a627e607ea7634c7bcb04
transaction
633815406a848278999297576c5aacb88cf73661ace1f08eda3de60c21061102
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 41075
recomputing…
the chainentry 41075
sealed to the entry before
0976cffb7f7306280907928599ca62909602057fe7fdf8be5609d95602f9e7fa
this leaf
9573d8de34b714f3ac901316b2ec93f24bb367163dc0de82faaa23c13e58b398
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
kWrlSRgh4M3vYGhTc1wThvvgX+u42+YZSvgGMS1zG2SsfBzEQdxjlubKPR/Osp8Zxp26n9gLGS5WQxNx7IeeBQ==