why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDFUGYFVNCZPMZLE4IJUVIIU35Z2KJPI4SJN5PN3GMGLK62ZLMTPQXQ4 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9c9e2d54fa560533ef7b6b2f749ae26935e3ef0adafd5a5c95a59ddd97231ceb
- request
- 0a9d5616ebc93666bcdd9125d5304a0596b40d109ee40a766cf64e35ae815417
- transaction
- e9dc860f14141a7ed444bb00292c7410f2c21cf65f7f2c367f50c91fb8b027d0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 25107
the chainentry 25107
- sealed to the entry before
- a40490a02a80b9f46547050e7ae1f8210e65022384a4111a882ec421dab3beed
- this leaf
- 958153aaf3efa89cad5c9f3e3c8075710bd3221498c2fc3031347e642a0e4bea
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- NeNW1efTJPDk/s952VXz4qaFxPNnYu4UOm4cGpNnH/crUUuKtpS2NL14eUQ0mHZKW+/7YThZVtxxCkgb7XkPAw==