why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAW7WVIFY2B2YWZYYLTS54KVICDQIDPVD52LOINMHEONCK4OQUOLJ6RP to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b8c60ae542e59d894dcbb8641f6326c53ae7f7c3b9f0f2d0c2ae0ffdbcfdfe5c
- request
- 3a421bff6a5febf2ac4f9b62d3ea7aa5583598392f76a45bb7d1b0dcc9c24c9c
- transaction
- aea935b55b4c712e37b029a47fcb176f8a523076b7fc35695b7148f2263dd438computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7466
the chainentry 7466
- sealed to the entry before
- bb292477bc39475011f7a4e0bb0b4b6fc8819a24d49a21ee187d53b14a98724a
- this leaf
- 95ba7203aa9da689efff5bdd6ec040b35c86e2c435b59dd55a4ffb8b801e5800
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- JKEjtvur8i95teuGRLNzbG28cvbrXw84ly5wEVAFhybnyNB3BbKEOiwSi4COKP3cVrO41rlyS9sa7pS6LeSOBA==