livelog 10,984 entries · root 1cf77a8f6197 · read 00:47:54
the record/entry 7394
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBU6XBULDZ56TCDS5Z3UDXUV5GSX6RNULWLMU5EMP6RGTI5FUGKAN3NL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.520ms2026-08-14 05:32:26
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBU6XBULDZ56TCDS5Z3UDXUV5GSX6RNULWLMU5EMP6RGTI5FUGKAN3NL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0f52600c2cfc866bd0d9c5542e020f6162dbd4974584341ffd35f551d4eaf04c
request
9c78a625d16fe7d9e7983d5485305d21ef7ad27565319469e9c4baa2e278e093
transaction
0d009766eaa713f545071e96fcd9a5b44ea1b185a5383905b92fff31dbb6564f
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7394
recomputing…
the chainentry 7394
sealed to the entry before
d7c6fe2f02a7070e3fde3da207d1e6279ae7a0e1edfe55ba5cfc58271066348a
this leaf
95f305f01462645795a73986d4fccd70c2c7994573f19f15187898affa5548f0
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
azDRdfuc0JrJ2kRSJd/2H9T0zfqE7/FC4znyA73X3hXpRzjOMMkprObFsSCca4qghPvhgQpJMW9mNNQWmCJACQ==