livelog 44,517 entries · root 0738b890afe0 · read 00:05:23
the record/entry 43807
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBVI3AEJQX64UYGZ3AO4QL54KVEM7SJIYBTV2ZAW4TH324BJUMNSJUMH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.997ms2026-09-11 10:55:09
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBVI3AEJQX64UYGZ3AO4QL54KVEM7SJIYBTV2ZAW4TH324BJUMNSJUMH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0bb0cbaa30fef4bff09e06dbf2af6eb10d14e8860f5bf3c0f589b22a88914910
request
f495f568016a4a0b3a830db21cc381724934061f31f53adf7e68949de830bd66
transaction
0b6b5eef78d7d38eab61344137ba1786ade331e4318eec41b47fdd8de4fe1a83
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 43807
recomputing…
the chainentry 43807
sealed to the entry before
7a1d697068186dfb4fbbe273381e3eb273f87475469ee600bef470bf11fbf47d
this leaf
96276ccff376110a44726778fdcf423c04cf90b7784ee7b9a0b0d0cc476c5e78
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
+FXqFoQY7yh5vOkJ2F9kRk7nLGj704DDKPPnU/eNITxGLgkEeWyy2rcWmqdPprbtHv6lPQDyBiYiKb5KfNhxCA==