why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCOEL2QLNWCXNKALRDQRBDS2XTLBB6FDVAM3KZHXUA3FJ5VRACSXNFBJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6b06b6c0f8f4bdcd26669ea0e56f54b2b043cb51c2ce3db05e061d0f934c9736
- request
- f9b82bd736b257346c642a5510d1ab271879e04925a775b0b419c4aa74c51cd9
- transaction
- 34ec909f5b22f0e9b1559a42ca1a482b3b7c94e14ac791d430c93295651a1f6acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 9494
the chainentry 9494
- sealed to the entry before
- 7ce947c136f3bb3fefe511607dbb72290321b225eede710d5eda01755a7e18b5
- this leaf
- 963f3c51875ca06dc7ad7aaf9780a86564525dd323ba5561246603187007ad67
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- BQ29MdrPekuO5TRDHlpwiV4jOmsSUPxRb96fR6DvAvb7EWTSucu62m26bZWGaZ6qYY8S2XCLfYGK3KdqGW+9DQ==