why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBEGHM2LOYKB3XH3INCYUNWOEFBIA47KFQ3BINKQOIT3MCO2A3UQFT3K, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBEGHM2LOYKB3XH3INCYUNWOEFBIA47KFQ3BINKQOIT3MCO2A3UQFT3K is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7364ee1cad6c72e45c49ccdacd176d068ee6555759483095792fa89e980ecf8c
- request
- 2675d8b2a15690c0c56466d62824b19ad2813dee1a1f4e8cffb694c6cb6ccf06
- transaction
- a5fbd0638d0cef1dc9a0c9808a4acc83f6b706f6e5229794c8f81e6095e7096fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 16429
the chainentry 16429
- sealed to the entry before
- 8809def814ea1dde49a35d8f174fea87aa06320ef140b1c3288c88e26589f740
- this leaf
- 96441987c9cf073ee5020200a6bdd26172b12552038327f9883fca46f42d6eae
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- eX4DCH3FtnBpQweiDgnk4/RwpX9GrnY6jBCUEGejf8ipwDBsglCl0PX67zPHo9vACRKcPcNYgpE0HfmChSs+DA==