why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBDJWGMFOZIEQPB5YV7CFRDUZVJFXJNGOBBLIT43XBSI3MIPMVRGRPND to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 3ce4cc8061845b0c9d27511eaa25e9dd82e8dac8f8499e853d7012a1ae42d4fd
- request
- adc9f41f77ff1834b078c9e522e1d1c14af06440883f7455735d4c98370e6362
- transaction
- 4ec22202a09292e23c2cc66f40503e4c1e031c9d3cc2f532e62b3a15c87e9912computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 59358
the chainentry 59358
- sealed to the entry before
- 82d98a4f071c9ef0d4cf770720ba35027d22fe1b6cef0c6058f434d6a94ac6dd
- this leaf
- 964d1c49afe1054d827a6ffb5456c2a5a5c60802db21a059003cf0ef5630da33
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- um71pJpiv/MbGgWdMnT8nAOwadnMyH6oNuKh8r66trPOBz2d6oibOYVoym0ZYroUNEEAp9N8NgppsnvaTqeIBw==