why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GAPDXNV4DCZMJQSYAC7PGT2UJOZKRE2KXAYDKP6BRSOK2NUJ5UVIG6HH, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBWDKFKW7BRCMCKHD5JLWJVHV3AETKOWOOXC23V2JIPAKSO4Q66Y2RBW, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBWDKFKW7BRCMCKHD5JLWJVHV3AETKOWOOXC23V2JIPAKSO4Q66Y2RBW is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d99b5ccf44cad99252890d4ddc73ae05c92295a499d15eba424dffb2ab3e46e1
- request
- 6b56fd5968a5cd4aeae5cd3655e81cd1afc028e969a9c502896e5dbdb72c5fef
- transaction
- d82e9195b16595b5ad6eb5bb8856f1812cec1fde0df2f92e215e490b57aade01computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 70611
the chainentry 70611
- sealed to the entry before
- 4155531a332e2edd29fa572181926c3619c0443b8ecaca1798d57f6e8eb3b2de
- this leaf
- 965ea8d2231e745e14f39540638ef224a50e7d83bfddf3af223bf90ba7c749ec
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +ZBdb+aDSyc+bZlacCfL+0C/i4+FDRtbZBf40xONNuh48df+cgkWXO3OM+x/+pDKkL9FmRIuem37qtyDi8F2Dw==